Thursday, February 28, 2008

Supreme Court Declares Impotence in Landmark Case

In a landmark decision Monday, the United States Supreme Court declared its impotence and ineffectiveness in upholding its solitary duty in interpreting the Constitution. Like a Viagra patient without their medication, the court once again denied to hear the case of We The People v. United States, and showed that its strongest strength may well lie on the golf green.

The case was first filed in July of 2004, and sought to force the government to address their formal petition for a redress of grievances in regard to income tax, which was filed in November of 2002. In May of 2007 the case was rejected by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and brought before the Supreme Court on January 7th, 2008. We the people sought a definition of the duties of Government to its people under the Constitution's petition clause, which had it been heard, would have been a first impression case (meaning the Supreme Court had never previously ruled on such a case).

Having exhausted all other options, Bob Shultz and The We the People Foundation made one final desperate attempt to obtain justice for their cause. On February 1st, 2008, they filed a petition for rehearing. Shultz publically declared the “… Court would be abdicating its duty and committing treason to the Constitution if it fails to [accept jurisdiction and hear this case]”. He went on to say that he made such accusations according to the courts own precedent.

Foreseeing the outcome of their final appeal, The We the People Foundation announced that upon rejection of their final petition, they would turn their attention and resources to the implementation of large scale, wide-spread acts of “civil disobedience”. Delivering on that promise, Shultz announced yesterday that a series of meetings would be held at various locations around the country to begin planning and implementing such actions. Details of exactly what the foundation has in mind have yet to be released. Of only one thing can we be sure, in rejecting a landmark case such as this one without so much as even a single comment; the Supreme Court has indirectly ruled once and for all that it is an ineffective puppet to a tyrannical government spiraling out of control toward a cataclysmic end.